When the Tiger first appeared on the battlefields of the Russian Eastern Front and North Africa in 1942-43, it was likely to win any individual engagement with an enemy tank. Only once the Soviet T-34 and American Sherman tanks began to appear in ever greater numbers was the reign of the Tiger eclipsed, which eventually resulted in victory for the Allies.
Wwii Battle Tanks T34 Versus Tiger Serial Number
This movie has some vivid battle scenes, but also suffers from a number of historical inaccuracies. It features T-34-85 tanks, which only appeared in the Red Army in 1944, post-war Ural trucks, as well as BTR-40 light armored personnel carriers, which were used to portray German vehicles, but which were, in fact, first manufactured in the Soviet Union in the 1950s.
First seen on the battlefield in large numbers during World War I, tanks were used as a ram to break through enemy trenches or to provide a safe firing position for infantry support troops. It was during the period between world wars that tank strategies began to develop.
Success bred success. The more the StuG. III was appreciated to be a useful battlefield asset, the more that were built. But, for all its qualities, the Sturmgeschütz III never enjoyed the same iconic status as the Tiger and Panther. It was ugly, unsophisticated and less capable than its tank cousins, yet it delivered a disproportionately high number of tank kills relative to other more capable German tanks.
Modern Soviet-derived designs weigh 38 to 48 metric tons (42 to 52 American tons), armed with a 125 mm smoothbore cannon, and manned by three soldiers (commander, driver, and gunner). All current Ukrainian and Russian main battle tanks are variations on this theme, albeit each has its own quirks. The groundbreaking T-64 turned out to be a mechanical mess, and its successor, the T-80, was similarly overengineered, but they happened to be built in Kharkiv, so they became the mainstay of the post-Soviet Ukrainian army, which further upgraded some as T-84s. Meanwhile the less potent but more reliable T-72 was built in vast numbers, mostly by a factory in the Urals, and repeatedly upgraded, and its much-modernized offshoot the T-90 is the cutting-edge Russian tank.
Apart from the moderate success of the Churchill and the later cruisers, the story of British wartime tank development is a sorry one. It had got off to a bad start as a result of insufficient pre-war funding, and a lack of political and military drive to develop the armoured forces. Uncertainty over the role of tanks led to the conflicting developmental paths of infantry tanks and cruisers. Defeat in 1940 prompted the panic building of inadequate designs, which impeded the development of more promising tanks. Rushed production and design flaws led to reliability issues. External constraints meant tanks had limited capacity for future armament upgrades. From late 1942, US tanks were required in increasing numbers to make up for the deficiencies of home-grown products. Only in 1944 was British industry able to deliver a tank reasonably fit for a fast-moving battlefield, and even then it was scarcely a match for its opponents. 2ff7e9595c
Comments